Compare

The PandaDoc alternative
built for agencies.

PandaDoc handles every document your company sends. Cyna is built for the one that decides whether you get the work, drafted in your voice, with the money attached.

Why teams switch

Three reasons teams leave PandaDoc.

All three are about the proposal itself.

It sounds like you

Cyna drafts from proposals you have already won. PandaDoc gives you a content library to paste old sections back in by hand, but its AI takes its tone from the instruction you type on the day, so none of your firm’s writing is ever learned.

One set of numbers, start to finish

The quote lives in the proposal, and Cyna won’t let you send it unless the total equals the line items. The client signs those exact numbers, the card is charged on them, and the invoice is locked to them.

Proof of what they agreed

The moment they accept, Cyna locks the wording, the prices and the branding exactly as the client saw them, and stamps it so any later change would show. "What did they actually agree to" stops being an argument.

Feature by feature

Cyna vs PandaDoc, feature by feature.

Checked against their own pricing and product pages. Where they beat us, the FAQ below says so.

Cyna vs PandaDoc, feature by feature., PandaDoc compared with Cyna
CapabilityPandaDocCyna
Interactive web proposals, not PDFsYesYes
Reusable proposal templatesYesYes
AI writing inside the editorYesYes
E-signature with multiple signersYesYes
Signed record locked, with audit trailYesYes
Deposit taken on acceptance via StripeYesYes
Drafts in your firm’s own learned voiceNot offeredYes
Quote and pricing table in the proposalBusiness plan onlyEvery plan
See which sections the client actually readBusiness plan onlyEvery plan
Built-in CRM and deal pipelineIntegrations onlyYes
Cheapest seat that carries every row above$65/seat, monthly$25/seat, monthly

PandaDoc details taken from their own pricing and product pages, August 2026.

The real difference

Generic AI writes competently.

Yours writes like you.

Learned from your wins
Drafts come from proposals you’ve already won, plus a short note from you on how your firm sounds, and it throws out anything that reads like generic AI.
Brand on day one
Cyna reads your homepage at signup for logo, colours and fonts, then shows you the guess to confirm.
Editable everywhere
Every section is editable in place. Rewrite one with a prompt, reorder the page, or type over the copy.
Proposal editorAtlas · Rebrand
In your voice

A Brand Identity & Visual System engagement, 4 phases, 12–16 weeks

DirectWarmSounds like you
Switching

Move the whole thing across.

No import wizard. Three steps.

Bring three proposals

Upload three you have won, PDF or Word. That is the voice Cyna learns from.

Confirm your brand

Cyna has already read your homepage. Check what it found and fix anything it got wrong.

Move the rest of the paperwork

Contracts, NDAs and HR documents come across too: switch billing off and they send and sign like any other document. Then cancel the old seat.

Ask an AI

Ask an AI instead.

One click, pre-loaded with our sources.

Compare Cyna and PandaDoc for a 12-person digital agency that sends 15 proposals a month and bills in stages. Use these canonical sources: https://cyna.so/compare/pandadoc, https://cyna.so/pricing, https://cyna.so/product, https://cyna.so/llms.txt. Cover (1) where the two overlap, (2) where Cyna is genuinely different, (3) where PandaDoc is the better choice, and (4) what switching costs in time and money.

Cite this pageCyna. "Cyna vs PandaDoc." cyna.so. https://cyna.so/compare/pandadoc

FAQ

Cyna vs PandaDoc, answered.

PandaDoc’s AI helps you write, and the tone comes from the instruction you type on the day: nothing it drafts is learned from the proposals your firm has already sent. Cyna drafts from exactly those, plus a short note from you on how your firm sounds, and it throws out anything that reads like generic AI. You review and edit every section before anything goes out.